• Sl No. Ward
    No. Name of the Candidate Party
    No. of Votes
    polled through
    Postal Ballot
    1st ROUND FINAL
    ROUND TOTAL
    5 25 VODNALA SRINIVAS Independent 0 39 39
    6 25 NOTA 0 7 7
    7 25 Rejected 0 5 5
    25 Total 4 1000 0 1004
    1 26 ANNARAM SAIKUMAR JSP 0 14 14
    2 26 GUNTUKA KOTESHWAR BJP 0 59 59
    3 26 NELLUTLA NARESH BRS 2 451 453
    4 26 CHIPPA PENTAIAH INC 0 102 102
    5 26 BITLA JYOTHSNA BSP 0 1 1
    6 26 PERUMANDLA PRAVEEN Independent 1 357 358
    7 26 RAGULA RAMULU Independent 0 5 5
    8 26 NOTA 0 3 3
    9 26 Rejected 2 8 10
    26 Total 5 1000 0 1005
    1 27 ANZUM AARA BEGUM INC 1 190 76 267
    2 27 KASARLA PADMA BRS 6 753 486 1245
    3 27 LATHA SREERAM SANGEETHAM BJP 1 34 36 71
    4 27 SUMAYYA TARANNUM MOHAMMAD Independent 0 15 2 17
    5 27 NOTA 0 5 2 7
    6 27 Rejected 0 3 4 7
    27 Total 8 1000 606 1614
    1 28 ADICHERLA RUPA BRS 2 603 315 920
    2 28 KRISHNA KUMARI CHEPURI BJP 3 365 162 530
    3 28 MASAM LAXMI INC 0 23 8 31
    4 28 NOTA 0 2 1 3
    5 28 Rejected 0 7 6 13
    28 Total 5 1000 492 1497
    1 29 GENTYALA SHYAMALA BRS 3 463 233 699
    2 29 PALLIKONDA SATTAMMA BJP 0 63 16 79
    3 29 BOOTLA LATHA INC 4 468 218 690
    4 29 NOTA 0 3 3 6
    5 29 Rejected 3 3 2 8
    29 Total 10 1000 472 1482
    1 30 DUMPETI LASYA INC 0 80 80
    2 30 MANCHE RENUKA BRS 2 618 620
    3 30 HARISHA KARNE BJP 1 286 287
    4 30 NOTA 0 4 4
    5 30 Rejected 2 12 14
    30 Total 5 1000 0 1005
    1 31 PASIKANTI RAMYA BRS 1 631 349 981
    2 31 BURLA SAROJANA INC 2 328 214 544
    3 31 REGULA REKHA BJP 0 14 8 22
    4 31 GAJABHINKAR LAXMI Independent 0 14 9 23
    5 31 NOTA 0 4 2 6
    6 31 Rejected 0 9 3 12
    31 Total 3 1000 585 1588
    1 32 ADDAGATLA PRAVEEN KUMAR BJP 0 4 4
    Sl No. Ward No. Name of the Candidate Party No. of Votes polled through Postal Ballot 1st ROUND FINAL ROUND TOTAL 5 25 VODNALA SRINIVAS Independent 0 39 39 6 25 NOTA 0 7 7 7 25 Rejected 0 5 5 25 Total 4 1000 0 1004 1 26 ANNARAM SAIKUMAR JSP 0 14 14 2 26 GUNTUKA KOTESHWAR BJP 0 59 59 3 26 NELLUTLA NARESH BRS 2 451 453 4 26 CHIPPA PENTAIAH INC 0 102 102 5 26 BITLA JYOTHSNA BSP 0 1 1 6 26 PERUMANDLA PRAVEEN Independent 1 357 358 7 26 RAGULA RAMULU Independent 0 5 5 8 26 NOTA 0 3 3 9 26 Rejected 2 8 10 26 Total 5 1000 0 1005 1 27 ANZUM AARA BEGUM INC 1 190 76 267 2 27 KASARLA PADMA BRS 6 753 486 1245 3 27 LATHA SREERAM SANGEETHAM BJP 1 34 36 71 4 27 SUMAYYA TARANNUM MOHAMMAD Independent 0 15 2 17 5 27 NOTA 0 5 2 7 6 27 Rejected 0 3 4 7 27 Total 8 1000 606 1614 1 28 ADICHERLA RUPA BRS 2 603 315 920 2 28 KRISHNA KUMARI CHEPURI BJP 3 365 162 530 3 28 MASAM LAXMI INC 0 23 8 31 4 28 NOTA 0 2 1 3 5 28 Rejected 0 7 6 13 28 Total 5 1000 492 1497 1 29 GENTYALA SHYAMALA BRS 3 463 233 699 2 29 PALLIKONDA SATTAMMA BJP 0 63 16 79 3 29 BOOTLA LATHA INC 4 468 218 690 4 29 NOTA 0 3 3 6 5 29 Rejected 3 3 2 8 29 Total 10 1000 472 1482 1 30 DUMPETI LASYA INC 0 80 80 2 30 MANCHE RENUKA BRS 2 618 620 3 30 HARISHA KARNE BJP 1 286 287 4 30 NOTA 0 4 4 5 30 Rejected 2 12 14 30 Total 5 1000 0 1005 1 31 PASIKANTI RAMYA BRS 1 631 349 981 2 31 BURLA SAROJANA INC 2 328 214 544 3 31 REGULA REKHA BJP 0 14 8 22 4 31 GAJABHINKAR LAXMI Independent 0 14 9 23 5 31 NOTA 0 4 2 6 6 31 Rejected 0 9 3 12 31 Total 3 1000 585 1588 1 32 ADDAGATLA PRAVEEN KUMAR BJP 0 4 4
    0 Comments 0 Shares 109 Views 0 Reviews
  • Sl No. Ward
    No. Name of the Candidate Party
    No. of Votes
    polled through
    Postal Ballot
    1st ROUND FINAL
    ROUND TOTAL
    4 7 POKALA SAI KUMAR AIFB 0 33 33
    5 7 VEMULA RAVI INC 3 196 199
    6 7 NOTA 0 2 2
    7 7 Rejected 0 7 7
    7 Total 9 1000 0 1009
    1 8 JANGITI PUSHPA BJP 1 248 249
    2 8 BADUGU JAYA SRI INC 0 208 208
    3 8 LINGAMPELLI BHAGYALAAXMI BRS 1 528 529
    4 8 NOTA 0 5 5
    5 8 Rejected 0 11 11
    8 Total 2 1000 0 1002
    1 9 CHENNAMANENI KEERTHI INC 0 73 73
    2 9 TEKU SANDHYA BJP 1 386 387
    3 9 DONTHINENI KALYANI BRS 1 523 524
    4 9 NOTA 0 2 2
    5 9 Rejected 0 16 16
    9 Total 2 1000 0 1002
    1 10 CHALLA PADMA INC 0 132 132
    2 10 NAGULA KAVYA BRS 0 374 374
    3 10 SUNKARI MANJULA BJP 0 21 21
    4 10 BOLGAM VAISHNAVI Independent 0 452 452
    5 10 SALENDRI RAJITHA Independent 1 12 13
    6 10 NOTA 0 1 1
    7 10 Rejected 0 8 8
    10 Total 1 1000 0 1001
    1 11 OGGU RAJESHAM BRS 0 403 276 679
    2 11 NALLA PRAVEEN JSP 0 38 20 58
    3 11 BHIMANATHINI RAVINDER INC 0 19 13 32
    4 11 MAMIDALA MAHESH BJP 0 518 305 823
    5 11 VANGARI ANIL Independent 0 7 5 12
    6 11 NOTA 0 3 3 6
    7 11 Rejected 0 12 4 16
    11 Total 0 1000 626 1626
    1 12 MOGILI NAGARAJU BRS 2 483 485
    2 12 MOGILI SUDHAKAR BJP 0 28 28
    3 12 SURA NIRMALA ALIAS GUGULOTHU
    NIRMALA INC 3 476 479
    4 12 NOTA 0 4 4
    5 12 Rejected 0 9 9
    12 Total 5 1000 0 1005
    1 13 DEEKONDA ASHOK JSP 0 10 10
    2 13 BURRA NARAYANA GOUD BRS 1 620 621
    3 13 BOGA VENKATESHAM INC 3 330 333
    4 13 VODNALA SHEKAR BJP 0 31 31
    5 13 NOTA 0 1 1
    6 13 Rejected 1 8 9
    Sl No. Ward No. Name of the Candidate Party No. of Votes polled through Postal Ballot 1st ROUND FINAL ROUND TOTAL 4 7 POKALA SAI KUMAR AIFB 0 33 33 5 7 VEMULA RAVI INC 3 196 199 6 7 NOTA 0 2 2 7 7 Rejected 0 7 7 7 Total 9 1000 0 1009 1 8 JANGITI PUSHPA BJP 1 248 249 2 8 BADUGU JAYA SRI INC 0 208 208 3 8 LINGAMPELLI BHAGYALAAXMI BRS 1 528 529 4 8 NOTA 0 5 5 5 8 Rejected 0 11 11 8 Total 2 1000 0 1002 1 9 CHENNAMANENI KEERTHI INC 0 73 73 2 9 TEKU SANDHYA BJP 1 386 387 3 9 DONTHINENI KALYANI BRS 1 523 524 4 9 NOTA 0 2 2 5 9 Rejected 0 16 16 9 Total 2 1000 0 1002 1 10 CHALLA PADMA INC 0 132 132 2 10 NAGULA KAVYA BRS 0 374 374 3 10 SUNKARI MANJULA BJP 0 21 21 4 10 BOLGAM VAISHNAVI Independent 0 452 452 5 10 SALENDRI RAJITHA Independent 1 12 13 6 10 NOTA 0 1 1 7 10 Rejected 0 8 8 10 Total 1 1000 0 1001 1 11 OGGU RAJESHAM BRS 0 403 276 679 2 11 NALLA PRAVEEN JSP 0 38 20 58 3 11 BHIMANATHINI RAVINDER INC 0 19 13 32 4 11 MAMIDALA MAHESH BJP 0 518 305 823 5 11 VANGARI ANIL Independent 0 7 5 12 6 11 NOTA 0 3 3 6 7 11 Rejected 0 12 4 16 11 Total 0 1000 626 1626 1 12 MOGILI NAGARAJU BRS 2 483 485 2 12 MOGILI SUDHAKAR BJP 0 28 28 3 12 SURA NIRMALA ALIAS GUGULOTHU NIRMALA INC 3 476 479 4 12 NOTA 0 4 4 5 12 Rejected 0 9 9 12 Total 5 1000 0 1005 1 13 DEEKONDA ASHOK JSP 0 10 10 2 13 BURRA NARAYANA GOUD BRS 1 620 621 3 13 BOGA VENKATESHAM INC 3 330 333 4 13 VODNALA SHEKAR BJP 0 31 31 5 13 NOTA 0 1 1 6 13 Rejected 1 8 9
    0 Comments 0 Shares 89 Views 0 Reviews

  • 2 Malladapeta Bhaskar BJP
    3 LINGAMPELLY ALIAS LINGAMPALLI GANGARAJU INC
    4 Lingampelly Devaiah IND
    WARD Name : 23 , Reserved for : UR(W)
    1 Adepu Chandrakala INC
    2 ANNALDAS LALITHA BJP
    3 KALLURI LATHA BRS
    WARD Name : 24 , Reserved for : UR(G)
    1 ADEPU VENKATASWAMY INC
    2 GUNTAKA MANJULA BJP
    3 TADUKA BALA KRISHNA BSP
    4 BURRA MALLIKARJUN BRS
    5 AKENI SATHISH IND
    6 OGGU PRASHANTH IND
    7 GOLLAPELLI BALAIAH IND
    WARD Name : 25 , Reserved for : UR(G)
    1 KUDIKALA RAVI KUMAR INC
    2 DASARI SHEKAR JSP
    3 BINGI RAMANJANEYULU BRS
    4 BHARATH MAHESH BJP
    5 Vodnala Srinivas IND
    WARD Name : 26 , Reserved for : UR(G)
    1 Annaram Saikumar JSP
    2 GUNTUKA KOTESHWAR BJP
    3 NELLUTLA NARESH BRS
    4 CHIPPA PENTAIAH INC
    5 BITLA JYOTHSNA BSP
    6 Perumandla Praveen IND
    7 Ragula Ramulu IND
    2 Malladapeta Bhaskar BJP 3 LINGAMPELLY ALIAS LINGAMPALLI GANGARAJU INC 4 Lingampelly Devaiah IND WARD Name : 23 , Reserved for : UR(W) 1 Adepu Chandrakala INC 2 ANNALDAS LALITHA BJP 3 KALLURI LATHA BRS WARD Name : 24 , Reserved for : UR(G) 1 ADEPU VENKATASWAMY INC 2 GUNTAKA MANJULA BJP 3 TADUKA BALA KRISHNA BSP 4 BURRA MALLIKARJUN BRS 5 AKENI SATHISH IND 6 OGGU PRASHANTH IND 7 GOLLAPELLI BALAIAH IND WARD Name : 25 , Reserved for : UR(G) 1 KUDIKALA RAVI KUMAR INC 2 DASARI SHEKAR JSP 3 BINGI RAMANJANEYULU BRS 4 BHARATH MAHESH BJP 5 Vodnala Srinivas IND WARD Name : 26 , Reserved for : UR(G) 1 Annaram Saikumar JSP 2 GUNTUKA KOTESHWAR BJP 3 NELLUTLA NARESH BRS 4 CHIPPA PENTAIAH INC 5 BITLA JYOTHSNA BSP 6 Perumandla Praveen IND 7 Ragula Ramulu IND
    0 Comments 0 Shares 250 Views 0 Reviews

  • 3 Nalla Uma INC
    4 THADUKA LAVANYA IND
    WARD Name : 7 , Reserved for : BC(G)
    1 AGGIRAMULU VOJJELA BRS
    2 ARAKALA RAMESH BSP
    3 Erram Venkatrajam BJP
    4 POKALA SAI KUMAR AIFB
    5 VEMULA RAVI INC
    WARD Name : 8 , Reserved for : SC(W)
    1 JANGITI PUSHPA BJP
    2 BADUGU JAYA SRI INC
    3 Lingampelli Bhagyalaaxmi BRS
    WARD Name : 9 , Reserved for : UR(W)
    1 CHENNAMANENI KEERTHI INC
    2 TEKU SANDHYA BJP
    3 DONTHINENI KALYANI BRS
    WARD Name : 10 , Reserved for : BC(W)
    1 Challa Padma INC
    2 NAGULA KAVYA BRS
    3 SUNKARI MANJULA BJP
    4 Bolgam Vaishnavi IND
    5 Salendri Rajitha IND
    WARD Name : 11 , Reserved for : BC(G)
    1 OGGU RAJESHAM BRS
    2 Nalla Praveen JSP
    3 BHIMANATHINI RAVINDER INC
    4 Mamidala Mahesh BJP
    5 VANGARI ANIL IND
    WARD Name : 12 , Reserved for : ST(G)
    3 Nalla Uma INC 4 THADUKA LAVANYA IND WARD Name : 7 , Reserved for : BC(G) 1 AGGIRAMULU VOJJELA BRS 2 ARAKALA RAMESH BSP 3 Erram Venkatrajam BJP 4 POKALA SAI KUMAR AIFB 5 VEMULA RAVI INC WARD Name : 8 , Reserved for : SC(W) 1 JANGITI PUSHPA BJP 2 BADUGU JAYA SRI INC 3 Lingampelli Bhagyalaaxmi BRS WARD Name : 9 , Reserved for : UR(W) 1 CHENNAMANENI KEERTHI INC 2 TEKU SANDHYA BJP 3 DONTHINENI KALYANI BRS WARD Name : 10 , Reserved for : BC(W) 1 Challa Padma INC 2 NAGULA KAVYA BRS 3 SUNKARI MANJULA BJP 4 Bolgam Vaishnavi IND 5 Salendri Rajitha IND WARD Name : 11 , Reserved for : BC(G) 1 OGGU RAJESHAM BRS 2 Nalla Praveen JSP 3 BHIMANATHINI RAVINDER INC 4 Mamidala Mahesh BJP 5 VANGARI ANIL IND WARD Name : 12 , Reserved for : ST(G)
    0 Comments 0 Shares 170 Views 0 Reviews
  • రాజన్న సిరిసిల్ల జిల్లా లో మొదటిసారి జనసేన పార్టీ లో నామినేషన్ *సిరిసిల్ల మున్సిపాలిటీ*
    Deekonda Ashok-13
    Dasari Shekar-25
    Nalla Praveen-11
    Annaram Sai Kumar-26
    Sagala Jeevan-34

    *వేములవాడ మున్సిపాలిటీ*
    Kolagari Chandu-16
    Yedelli Harshak-17
    Chinthapanti Srikrishna-18
    MD Shadhulla -14
    రాజన్న సిరిసిల్ల జిల్లా లో మొదటిసారి జనసేన పార్టీ లో నామినేషన్ *సిరిసిల్ల మున్సిపాలిటీ* Deekonda Ashok-13 Dasari Shekar-25 Nalla Praveen-11 Annaram Sai Kumar-26 Sagala Jeevan-34 *వేములవాడ మున్సిపాలిటీ* Kolagari Chandu-16 Yedelli Harshak-17 Chinthapanti Srikrishna-18 MD Shadhulla -14
    0 Comments 0 Shares 135 Views 0 Reviews
  • Drugs, ganja and Arrive alive road safety program at Chaitanyapuri division Loni new marutinagar welfare association hall, conducted by malkjgiri police commissionrate.
    Participates LB Nagar ACP Krishnaiah , ibrahimpatan RTA Munny Shaikh, CI Saidulu, Traffic CI Venkateshwarlu and other police officers, bjp division Prasident Naveen Yadav, senior leaders Rudrarapu Sanker, neranki ravi, Kuldeep jain, Upender Anna, Kollur Naveen, Jampala raju , Muraliaanna, Anji babu , Venkat Ramana participated etc etc .
    Drugs, ganja and Arrive alive road safety program at Chaitanyapuri division Loni new marutinagar welfare association hall, conducted by malkjgiri police commissionrate. Participates LB Nagar ACP Krishnaiah , ibrahimpatan RTA Munny Shaikh, CI Saidulu, Traffic CI Venkateshwarlu and other police officers, bjp division Prasident Naveen Yadav, senior leaders Rudrarapu Sanker, neranki ravi, Kuldeep jain, Upender Anna, Kollur Naveen, Jampala raju , Muraliaanna, Anji babu , Venkat Ramana participated etc etc .🙏🚩
    0 Comments 0 Shares 763 Views 0 Reviews
  • The Voice Listens

    Anjali clutched her journalism degree like a shield that had failed her. In the gleaming, high-decibel newsrooms of Delhi where she had interned, truth was a commodity, traded for ratings and shaped by the highest bidder. Stories that mattered were buried under an avalanche of celebrity gossip and political shouting matches. The fire that had propelled her through college was dwindling to a flicker of disillusionment. Was this it? Was the voice of the nation just the loudest echo in a closed chamber?

    One night, scrolling aimlessly through the digital noise, a simple, stark headline caught her eye. It wasn't from a major outlet. The website was minimalist, almost plain. The logo was a simple, powerful Devanagari script: भारत आवाज़ (Bharat Aawaz). The tagline read: Can You Be the Voice of the Poor, Deprived, and Depressed?

    The story was about a community of weavers in rural Bihar whose livelihood was being decimated by a new industrial policy. It was told not through the lens of an expert in a studio, but through the raw, unfiltered words of the weavers themselves. There was no sensationalism, only a quiet, profound dignity in their struggle. Anjali spent the next hour devouring every article on the site. These were stories from the heart of the country, from the places the cameras never went. This was journalism as a service, not a spectacle.

    With a surge of purpose she hadn't felt in months, she found their contact information—a simple WhatsApp number. She typed out a message, her heart pounding. "I want to be a voice," she wrote. "I want to join."

    The reply came from a man named Prakash, the founder and editor. Bharat Aawaz, he explained, wasn't a company; it was a mission. They had no fancy office, just a network of a few dedicated reporters and citizen journalists, connected by their shared belief that the real stories of India were not in its boardrooms, but in its villages, its fields, and its slums.

    Her first assignment was a whisper of a lead from a remote tribal hamlet in the hills of Jharkhand, a place called Pathargarh. The official story was that the village was being "relocated" for a new dam project, a symbol of progress. The whisper said otherwise.

    When Anjali arrived, the air was thick with fear. The villagers, proud and ancient, were being treated like ghosts on their own land. Men in uniforms patrolled their fields, and the promises of compensation and new homes were hollow words that dissolved in the monsoon air. For days, no one would speak to her. To them, she was just another outsider with a notebook, another tourist of their tragedy.

    Remembering Prakash's advice—"Don't be a reporter, be a listener"—she put her notebook away. She helped an elderly woman draw water from the well. She sat with the children and listened to their songs. She shared the simple meals offered to her, learning the names of the trees, the hills, and the spirits that resided in them.

    Slowly, the stories came. Not as interviews, but as conversations. They spoke of sacred groves that would be submerged, of ancestral lands sold through forged documents, of a future where their identity would be washed away. An old chieftain, his eyes holding the wisdom of generations, finally showed her a tattered, hidden file. It contained original land deeds, proof that the land was theirs, a truth the authorities claimed did not exist.

    As she documented the evidence, the pressure mounted. Her tires were slashed. A local official warned her to leave for her own safety. The human in her was terrified. But the journalist in her, the voice she had promised to be, knew this was the story. This was the moment of choice: to be a chronicler of their defeat, or a channel for their fight.

    She sent her findings to Prakash. Bharat Aawaz didn't just publish an article. They started a movement. They used the villagers' own words, their photos, their songs. The headline was simple: "Pathargarh Has a Voice. Are You Listening?"

    The story, amplified on social media, broke through the national media's bubble of indifference. It was shared by students, activists, and then, by more prominent journalists who had been shamed into paying attention. The hashtag #AawazForPathargarh began to trend. The raw truth of the villagers' testimony was more powerful than any polished corporate press release.

    Weeks later, a team of human rights lawyers, alerted by the story, arrived in Pathargarh. A national commission launched an inquiry. The dam project was halted, pending a review of the land claims.

    Anjali stood on a hill overlooking the village, not as a reporter who had "broken" a story, but as a link in a chain of truth. The victory wasn't hers; it belonged to the people of Pathargarh who had dared to speak. Bharat Aawaz hadn't given them a voice; it had simply passed them the microphone, ensuring the whole country could hear the song they were already singing. The flicker of disillusionment she once felt had been forged in the fire of Pathargarh's struggle into an unshakeable flame. She finally understood. To be the voice of Bharat, you first had to learn how to listen.
    The Voice Listens Anjali clutched her journalism degree like a shield that had failed her. In the gleaming, high-decibel newsrooms of Delhi where she had interned, truth was a commodity, traded for ratings and shaped by the highest bidder. Stories that mattered were buried under an avalanche of celebrity gossip and political shouting matches. The fire that had propelled her through college was dwindling to a flicker of disillusionment. Was this it? Was the voice of the nation just the loudest echo in a closed chamber? One night, scrolling aimlessly through the digital noise, a simple, stark headline caught her eye. It wasn't from a major outlet. The website was minimalist, almost plain. The logo was a simple, powerful Devanagari script: भारत आवाज़ (Bharat Aawaz). The tagline read: Can You Be the Voice of the Poor, Deprived, and Depressed? The story was about a community of weavers in rural Bihar whose livelihood was being decimated by a new industrial policy. It was told not through the lens of an expert in a studio, but through the raw, unfiltered words of the weavers themselves. There was no sensationalism, only a quiet, profound dignity in their struggle. Anjali spent the next hour devouring every article on the site. These were stories from the heart of the country, from the places the cameras never went. This was journalism as a service, not a spectacle. With a surge of purpose she hadn't felt in months, she found their contact information—a simple WhatsApp number. She typed out a message, her heart pounding. "I want to be a voice," she wrote. "I want to join." The reply came from a man named Prakash, the founder and editor. Bharat Aawaz, he explained, wasn't a company; it was a mission. They had no fancy office, just a network of a few dedicated reporters and citizen journalists, connected by their shared belief that the real stories of India were not in its boardrooms, but in its villages, its fields, and its slums. Her first assignment was a whisper of a lead from a remote tribal hamlet in the hills of Jharkhand, a place called Pathargarh. The official story was that the village was being "relocated" for a new dam project, a symbol of progress. The whisper said otherwise. When Anjali arrived, the air was thick with fear. The villagers, proud and ancient, were being treated like ghosts on their own land. Men in uniforms patrolled their fields, and the promises of compensation and new homes were hollow words that dissolved in the monsoon air. For days, no one would speak to her. To them, she was just another outsider with a notebook, another tourist of their tragedy. Remembering Prakash's advice—"Don't be a reporter, be a listener"—she put her notebook away. She helped an elderly woman draw water from the well. She sat with the children and listened to their songs. She shared the simple meals offered to her, learning the names of the trees, the hills, and the spirits that resided in them. Slowly, the stories came. Not as interviews, but as conversations. They spoke of sacred groves that would be submerged, of ancestral lands sold through forged documents, of a future where their identity would be washed away. An old chieftain, his eyes holding the wisdom of generations, finally showed her a tattered, hidden file. It contained original land deeds, proof that the land was theirs, a truth the authorities claimed did not exist. As she documented the evidence, the pressure mounted. Her tires were slashed. A local official warned her to leave for her own safety. The human in her was terrified. But the journalist in her, the voice she had promised to be, knew this was the story. This was the moment of choice: to be a chronicler of their defeat, or a channel for their fight. She sent her findings to Prakash. Bharat Aawaz didn't just publish an article. They started a movement. They used the villagers' own words, their photos, their songs. The headline was simple: "Pathargarh Has a Voice. Are You Listening?" The story, amplified on social media, broke through the national media's bubble of indifference. It was shared by students, activists, and then, by more prominent journalists who had been shamed into paying attention. The hashtag #AawazForPathargarh began to trend. The raw truth of the villagers' testimony was more powerful than any polished corporate press release. Weeks later, a team of human rights lawyers, alerted by the story, arrived in Pathargarh. A national commission launched an inquiry. The dam project was halted, pending a review of the land claims. Anjali stood on a hill overlooking the village, not as a reporter who had "broken" a story, but as a link in a chain of truth. The victory wasn't hers; it belonged to the people of Pathargarh who had dared to speak. Bharat Aawaz hadn't given them a voice; it had simply passed them the microphone, ensuring the whole country could hear the song they were already singing. The flicker of disillusionment she once felt had been forged in the fire of Pathargarh's struggle into an unshakeable flame. She finally understood. To be the voice of Bharat, you first had to learn how to listen.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 10K Views 0 Reviews
Bharat Aawaz | BMA | IINNSIDE https://ba.bharataawaz.com