• India might become the next powerful country then America in the next 10 years
    Indian youth not only protest now anymore they clean rivers and repair roads themselve ...
    India might become the next powerful country then America in the next 10 years Indian youth not only protest now anymore they clean rivers and repair roads themselve ...
    1 Comments 0 Shares 706 Views 0 Reviews
  • TEST
    TEST
    0 Comments 0 Shares 132 Views 0 Reviews
  • In tirupathi latest Covid case
    In tirupathi latest Covid case
    0 Comments 0 Shares 239 Views 0 Reviews
  • that is correct. Recent health reports from July 2026 confirm that two people associated with the YSR Kadapa district region have passed away after testing positive for COVID-19. These are the first reported fatalities related to the virus in Andhra Pradesh since 2022.


    The first patient, a 60-year-old from the Rajampeta area, passed away on June 28 while undergoing treatment at CMC Vellore for severe lung and kidney complications. A subsequent RT-PCR test confirmed he was COVID-19 positive.
    The second patient, a 43-to-46-year-old man from the Masapeta area in Kadapa city, passed away on July 7 at the GGH-RIMS hospital in Kadapa after suffering from severe bilateral pneumonia and underlying health complications.
    that is correct. Recent health reports from July 2026 confirm that two people associated with the YSR Kadapa district region have passed away after testing positive for COVID-19. These are the first reported fatalities related to the virus in Andhra Pradesh since 2022. The first patient, a 60-year-old from the Rajampeta area, passed away on June 28 while undergoing treatment at CMC Vellore for severe lung and kidney complications. A subsequent RT-PCR test confirmed he was COVID-19 positive. The second patient, a 43-to-46-year-old man from the Masapeta area in Kadapa city, passed away on July 7 at the GGH-RIMS hospital in Kadapa after suffering from severe bilateral pneumonia and underlying health complications.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views 0 Reviews
  • Raghava chadha is a greatest person of india to middle class peoples 🤩✊❤️🙌
    #raghavachadha #airports #price #dnewprices #supportraghavachadha
    Raghava chadha is a greatest person of india to middle class peoples 🤩✊❤️🙌 #raghavachadha #airports #price #dnewprices #supportraghavachadha
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views 2 0 Reviews
  • ₹2.65 Crore Cyber Fraud in Hyderabad
    A 69-year-old businessman from Hyderabad was allegedly duped of ₹2.65 crore in an online investment scam.
    The victim, a resident of Somajiguda, approached the Hyderabad Police cybercrime unit after realising he had been cheated.
    A woman identifying herself as Ramya Krishnan contacted him via social media
    She claimed to be investing in “Polyus Finance (PFP Gold)” and said she had invested ₹50 lakh with high returns
    She later encouraged him to invest in her upcoming resort and apparel business projects in Kerala and Hyderabad
    Trusting her, the businessman transferred large sums to bank accounts provided by her
    To build trust, the fraudster allegedly asked him to withdraw ₹50 as a test transaction
    Police have registered a case and launched an investigation.
    ⚠️ Authorities have advised citizens to verify online investment schemes carefully and avoid transferring money to unknown individuals promising high returns.
    @azharAlam
    #cyberfraud #hyderabad #online
    ₹2.65 Crore Cyber Fraud in Hyderabad A 69-year-old businessman from Hyderabad was allegedly duped of ₹2.65 crore in an online investment scam. The victim, a resident of Somajiguda, approached the Hyderabad Police cybercrime unit after realising he had been cheated. A woman identifying herself as Ramya Krishnan contacted him via social media She claimed to be investing in “Polyus Finance (PFP Gold)” and said she had invested ₹50 lakh with high returns She later encouraged him to invest in her upcoming resort and apparel business projects in Kerala and Hyderabad Trusting her, the businessman transferred large sums to bank accounts provided by her To build trust, the fraudster allegedly asked him to withdraw ₹50 as a test transaction Police have registered a case and launched an investigation. ⚠️ Authorities have advised citizens to verify online investment schemes carefully and avoid transferring money to unknown individuals promising high returns. @azharAlam #cyberfraud #hyderabad #online
    0 Comments 0 Shares 2K Views 0 Reviews
  • రాజన్న సిరిసిల్ల జిల్లా పోటీలో ఉన్న అభ్యర్థుల జాబితా Member Details
    Sl No. Name of the Contesting candidate Party Affiliation
    WARD Name : 1 , Reserved for : SC(G)
    1 ALUKA THIRUPATHI INC
    2 Bura Balamallu BRS
    3 VISHNU BOORA BJP
    4 KATHHERAPAKA RAJU IND
    5 BURA YADAGIRI IND
    WARD Name : 2 , Reserved for : BC(G)
    1 Dr. Kavitha Batthula Alias Kavitha Madupu INC
    2 DASHARATHEM SOMISHETTY AIFB
    3 Dumala Srikanth BJP
    4 Vemula Ramulu BRS
    5 Annarapu Devender IND
    WARD Name : 3 , Reserved for : BC(W)
    1 Kamuni Vanitha INC
    2 CHOPPADANDI SWAROOPA RANI BJP
    3 Jindam Kala BRS
    WARD Name : 4 , Reserved for : BC(W)
    1 ADDAGATLA MADHAVI BRS
    2 LAIQ SULTANA INC
    3 Sravanthi Maheshuni BJP
    WARD Name : 5 , Reserved for : BC(W)
    1 DARNAM ARUNA BRS
    2 Dudam Usha Sri BJP
    3 YELLE HEMALATHA INC
    WARD Name : 6 , Reserved for : UR(W)
    1 INJAPURI NAVYA BJP
    2 Dudam Rajani BRS
    రాజన్న సిరిసిల్ల జిల్లా పోటీలో ఉన్న అభ్యర్థుల జాబితా Member Details Sl No. Name of the Contesting candidate Party Affiliation WARD Name : 1 , Reserved for : SC(G) 1 ALUKA THIRUPATHI INC 2 Bura Balamallu BRS 3 VISHNU BOORA BJP 4 KATHHERAPAKA RAJU IND 5 BURA YADAGIRI IND WARD Name : 2 , Reserved for : BC(G) 1 Dr. Kavitha Batthula Alias Kavitha Madupu INC 2 DASHARATHEM SOMISHETTY AIFB 3 Dumala Srikanth BJP 4 Vemula Ramulu BRS 5 Annarapu Devender IND WARD Name : 3 , Reserved for : BC(W) 1 Kamuni Vanitha INC 2 CHOPPADANDI SWAROOPA RANI BJP 3 Jindam Kala BRS WARD Name : 4 , Reserved for : BC(W) 1 ADDAGATLA MADHAVI BRS 2 LAIQ SULTANA INC 3 Sravanthi Maheshuni BJP WARD Name : 5 , Reserved for : BC(W) 1 DARNAM ARUNA BRS 2 Dudam Usha Sri BJP 3 YELLE HEMALATHA INC WARD Name : 6 , Reserved for : UR(W) 1 INJAPURI NAVYA BJP 2 Dudam Rajani BRS
    0 Comments 0 Shares 1K Views 0 Reviews
  • Bharat Aawaz. Beyond News, Beyond Boundaries.

    Bharat Aawaz: Desh Ki Aawaz. Dive into the heart of India with the nation's premier National Media Network. Get the latest news, crucial updates, and exclusive inside stories that truly matter. Bharat Aawaz isn't just a news aggregator or an online portal; we are The Voice of People, the true Voice of India.

    #DeshkiAawaz #reporter #support
    #BharatAawaz #empowerment #telugunews #reporter
    Bharat Aawaz. Beyond News, Beyond Boundaries. Bharat Aawaz: Desh Ki Aawaz. Dive into the heart of India with the nation's premier National Media Network. Get the latest news, crucial updates, and exclusive inside stories that truly matter. Bharat Aawaz isn't just a news aggregator or an online portal; we are The Voice of People, the true Voice of India. #DeshkiAawaz #reporter #support #BharatAawaz #empowerment #telugunews #reporter
    Like
    Yay
    Wow
    3
    0 Comments 0 Shares 22K Views 0 Reviews
  • *The Question Isn't *What* Your Title Is. The Question Is *What* You Do With It.**

    You are a Reporter, a Journalist, a Coordinator. But let's ask a more fundamental question: When was the last time your question made power tremble? When did a Minister, an MP, an Officer pause and realize they were truly answerable to the people you represent?

    The sacred duty of the Press is to be the voice of the people and a mirror to power. But we are surrounded by the ghosts of failed promises, the cunning of empty manifestos, and the deafening silence where accountability should be.

    **Are we really doing our job? Or are we just reporting the excuses?**

    At Bharat Aawaz, we don't just ask the question. We build the platform for the answer. We believe in **“संवाद से समाधान” (Samvad Se Samadhan)** — moving from mere talk to tangible transformation.

    **Imagine this. Not as a dream, but as our blueprint for a revolution in accountability:**

    You will not just 'request' an interview. You will establish **The People's Forum** in your constituency. An arena where power doesn't lecture, it listens. Where the agenda is not set by the politician, but by the public.

    In this arena:
    * You will summon the sitting MLA or MP, and alongside them, every leader who contested for the people's vote.
    * You will call upon every key officer responsible for the constituency's welfare.
    * You will come armed not with opinions, but with undeniable facts—your ammunition will be RTI replies, documented evidence, and official records.
    * The people are not spectators; they are the jury. You will bring forward every citizen with a grievance, a problem, or a question.
    * The venue will not be a sterile conference room, but the heart of the community—a local school on a Sunday, where every citizen has a front-row seat to democracy.

    Every three months, this People's Forum will conduct a public audit. We will ask:
    * What was promised for the last 90 days?
    * What was delivered? What is pending, and why?
    * What is the concrete, written plan for the next 90 days?

    Everything will be concluded in writing. Not a political promise, but a public commitment. This is the **Real Performance Review**, conducted by the people, for the people. This is how we make our legislative and executive systems truly answerable.

    Each of these local forums is a tributary, feeding the great river of change that is the national **Bharat Conclave.**

    So, we ask you again. Are you just a reporter?

    Or are you ready to be an architect of accountability? With Bharat Aawaz, you are the living embodiment of Samvad Se Samadhan.
    *The Question Isn't *What* Your Title Is. The Question Is *What* You Do With It.** You are a Reporter, a Journalist, a Coordinator. But let's ask a more fundamental question: When was the last time your question made power tremble? When did a Minister, an MP, an Officer pause and realize they were truly answerable to the people you represent? The sacred duty of the Press is to be the voice of the people and a mirror to power. But we are surrounded by the ghosts of failed promises, the cunning of empty manifestos, and the deafening silence where accountability should be. **Are we really doing our job? Or are we just reporting the excuses?** At Bharat Aawaz, we don't just ask the question. We build the platform for the answer. We believe in **“संवाद से समाधान” (Samvad Se Samadhan)** — moving from mere talk to tangible transformation. **Imagine this. Not as a dream, but as our blueprint for a revolution in accountability:** You will not just 'request' an interview. You will establish **The People's Forum** in your constituency. An arena where power doesn't lecture, it listens. Where the agenda is not set by the politician, but by the public. In this arena: * You will summon the sitting MLA or MP, and alongside them, every leader who contested for the people's vote. * You will call upon every key officer responsible for the constituency's welfare. * You will come armed not with opinions, but with undeniable facts—your ammunition will be RTI replies, documented evidence, and official records. * The people are not spectators; they are the jury. You will bring forward every citizen with a grievance, a problem, or a question. * The venue will not be a sterile conference room, but the heart of the community—a local school on a Sunday, where every citizen has a front-row seat to democracy. Every three months, this People's Forum will conduct a public audit. We will ask: * What was promised for the last 90 days? * What was delivered? What is pending, and why? * What is the concrete, written plan for the next 90 days? Everything will be concluded in writing. Not a political promise, but a public commitment. This is the **Real Performance Review**, conducted by the people, for the people. This is how we make our legislative and executive systems truly answerable. Each of these local forums is a tributary, feeding the great river of change that is the national **Bharat Conclave.** So, we ask you again. Are you just a reporter? Or are you ready to be an architect of accountability? With Bharat Aawaz, you are the living embodiment of Samvad Se Samadhan.
    Love
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 5K Views 0 Reviews
  • The Voice Listens

    Anjali clutched her journalism degree like a shield that had failed her. In the gleaming, high-decibel newsrooms of Delhi where she had interned, truth was a commodity, traded for ratings and shaped by the highest bidder. Stories that mattered were buried under an avalanche of celebrity gossip and political shouting matches. The fire that had propelled her through college was dwindling to a flicker of disillusionment. Was this it? Was the voice of the nation just the loudest echo in a closed chamber?

    One night, scrolling aimlessly through the digital noise, a simple, stark headline caught her eye. It wasn't from a major outlet. The website was minimalist, almost plain. The logo was a simple, powerful Devanagari script: भारत आवाज़ (Bharat Aawaz). The tagline read: Can You Be the Voice of the Poor, Deprived, and Depressed?

    The story was about a community of weavers in rural Bihar whose livelihood was being decimated by a new industrial policy. It was told not through the lens of an expert in a studio, but through the raw, unfiltered words of the weavers themselves. There was no sensationalism, only a quiet, profound dignity in their struggle. Anjali spent the next hour devouring every article on the site. These were stories from the heart of the country, from the places the cameras never went. This was journalism as a service, not a spectacle.

    With a surge of purpose she hadn't felt in months, she found their contact information—a simple WhatsApp number. She typed out a message, her heart pounding. "I want to be a voice," she wrote. "I want to join."

    The reply came from a man named Prakash, the founder and editor. Bharat Aawaz, he explained, wasn't a company; it was a mission. They had no fancy office, just a network of a few dedicated reporters and citizen journalists, connected by their shared belief that the real stories of India were not in its boardrooms, but in its villages, its fields, and its slums.

    Her first assignment was a whisper of a lead from a remote tribal hamlet in the hills of Jharkhand, a place called Pathargarh. The official story was that the village was being "relocated" for a new dam project, a symbol of progress. The whisper said otherwise.

    When Anjali arrived, the air was thick with fear. The villagers, proud and ancient, were being treated like ghosts on their own land. Men in uniforms patrolled their fields, and the promises of compensation and new homes were hollow words that dissolved in the monsoon air. For days, no one would speak to her. To them, she was just another outsider with a notebook, another tourist of their tragedy.

    Remembering Prakash's advice—"Don't be a reporter, be a listener"—she put her notebook away. She helped an elderly woman draw water from the well. She sat with the children and listened to their songs. She shared the simple meals offered to her, learning the names of the trees, the hills, and the spirits that resided in them.

    Slowly, the stories came. Not as interviews, but as conversations. They spoke of sacred groves that would be submerged, of ancestral lands sold through forged documents, of a future where their identity would be washed away. An old chieftain, his eyes holding the wisdom of generations, finally showed her a tattered, hidden file. It contained original land deeds, proof that the land was theirs, a truth the authorities claimed did not exist.

    As she documented the evidence, the pressure mounted. Her tires were slashed. A local official warned her to leave for her own safety. The human in her was terrified. But the journalist in her, the voice she had promised to be, knew this was the story. This was the moment of choice: to be a chronicler of their defeat, or a channel for their fight.

    She sent her findings to Prakash. Bharat Aawaz didn't just publish an article. They started a movement. They used the villagers' own words, their photos, their songs. The headline was simple: "Pathargarh Has a Voice. Are You Listening?"

    The story, amplified on social media, broke through the national media's bubble of indifference. It was shared by students, activists, and then, by more prominent journalists who had been shamed into paying attention. The hashtag #AawazForPathargarh began to trend. The raw truth of the villagers' testimony was more powerful than any polished corporate press release.

    Weeks later, a team of human rights lawyers, alerted by the story, arrived in Pathargarh. A national commission launched an inquiry. The dam project was halted, pending a review of the land claims.

    Anjali stood on a hill overlooking the village, not as a reporter who had "broken" a story, but as a link in a chain of truth. The victory wasn't hers; it belonged to the people of Pathargarh who had dared to speak. Bharat Aawaz hadn't given them a voice; it had simply passed them the microphone, ensuring the whole country could hear the song they were already singing. The flicker of disillusionment she once felt had been forged in the fire of Pathargarh's struggle into an unshakeable flame. She finally understood. To be the voice of Bharat, you first had to learn how to listen.
    The Voice Listens Anjali clutched her journalism degree like a shield that had failed her. In the gleaming, high-decibel newsrooms of Delhi where she had interned, truth was a commodity, traded for ratings and shaped by the highest bidder. Stories that mattered were buried under an avalanche of celebrity gossip and political shouting matches. The fire that had propelled her through college was dwindling to a flicker of disillusionment. Was this it? Was the voice of the nation just the loudest echo in a closed chamber? One night, scrolling aimlessly through the digital noise, a simple, stark headline caught her eye. It wasn't from a major outlet. The website was minimalist, almost plain. The logo was a simple, powerful Devanagari script: भारत आवाज़ (Bharat Aawaz). The tagline read: Can You Be the Voice of the Poor, Deprived, and Depressed? The story was about a community of weavers in rural Bihar whose livelihood was being decimated by a new industrial policy. It was told not through the lens of an expert in a studio, but through the raw, unfiltered words of the weavers themselves. There was no sensationalism, only a quiet, profound dignity in their struggle. Anjali spent the next hour devouring every article on the site. These were stories from the heart of the country, from the places the cameras never went. This was journalism as a service, not a spectacle. With a surge of purpose she hadn't felt in months, she found their contact information—a simple WhatsApp number. She typed out a message, her heart pounding. "I want to be a voice," she wrote. "I want to join." The reply came from a man named Prakash, the founder and editor. Bharat Aawaz, he explained, wasn't a company; it was a mission. They had no fancy office, just a network of a few dedicated reporters and citizen journalists, connected by their shared belief that the real stories of India were not in its boardrooms, but in its villages, its fields, and its slums. Her first assignment was a whisper of a lead from a remote tribal hamlet in the hills of Jharkhand, a place called Pathargarh. The official story was that the village was being "relocated" for a new dam project, a symbol of progress. The whisper said otherwise. When Anjali arrived, the air was thick with fear. The villagers, proud and ancient, were being treated like ghosts on their own land. Men in uniforms patrolled their fields, and the promises of compensation and new homes were hollow words that dissolved in the monsoon air. For days, no one would speak to her. To them, she was just another outsider with a notebook, another tourist of their tragedy. Remembering Prakash's advice—"Don't be a reporter, be a listener"—she put her notebook away. She helped an elderly woman draw water from the well. She sat with the children and listened to their songs. She shared the simple meals offered to her, learning the names of the trees, the hills, and the spirits that resided in them. Slowly, the stories came. Not as interviews, but as conversations. They spoke of sacred groves that would be submerged, of ancestral lands sold through forged documents, of a future where their identity would be washed away. An old chieftain, his eyes holding the wisdom of generations, finally showed her a tattered, hidden file. It contained original land deeds, proof that the land was theirs, a truth the authorities claimed did not exist. As she documented the evidence, the pressure mounted. Her tires were slashed. A local official warned her to leave for her own safety. The human in her was terrified. But the journalist in her, the voice she had promised to be, knew this was the story. This was the moment of choice: to be a chronicler of their defeat, or a channel for their fight. She sent her findings to Prakash. Bharat Aawaz didn't just publish an article. They started a movement. They used the villagers' own words, their photos, their songs. The headline was simple: "Pathargarh Has a Voice. Are You Listening?" The story, amplified on social media, broke through the national media's bubble of indifference. It was shared by students, activists, and then, by more prominent journalists who had been shamed into paying attention. The hashtag #AawazForPathargarh began to trend. The raw truth of the villagers' testimony was more powerful than any polished corporate press release. Weeks later, a team of human rights lawyers, alerted by the story, arrived in Pathargarh. A national commission launched an inquiry. The dam project was halted, pending a review of the land claims. Anjali stood on a hill overlooking the village, not as a reporter who had "broken" a story, but as a link in a chain of truth. The victory wasn't hers; it belonged to the people of Pathargarh who had dared to speak. Bharat Aawaz hadn't given them a voice; it had simply passed them the microphone, ensuring the whole country could hear the song they were already singing. The flicker of disillusionment she once felt had been forged in the fire of Pathargarh's struggle into an unshakeable flame. She finally understood. To be the voice of Bharat, you first had to learn how to listen.
    0 Comments 0 Shares 17K Views 0 Reviews
  • *కలం Vs. కవాతు (The Pen Vs. The March)*

    We are often told the golden rule of journalism is objectivity—to be a dispassionate chronicler of events. But in the face of profound and undeniable injustice, that rule can feel like a moral betrayal.

    This question is about the two souls living within you: the Journalist and the Human.

    Have you ever covered a story where the 'objective' truth was so monstrously unjust that the Journalist's code of dispassion felt wholly inadequate? In that moment, did you feel a pull to let the Human take over—to drop the notebook, join the protest, or use your platform not just to inform, but to actively campaign for a specific outcome?

    Where do you draw your personal line? Is the highest calling of your profession to create a perfect, unimpeachable record of our times, or is it to bend the arc of history, even just a little, towards justice?

    జర్నలిజం యొక్క స్వర్ణ సూత్రం 'నిష్పాక్షికత' అని మనకు చెబుతారు - సంఘటనలకు కేవలం నిర్లిప్త సాక్షిగా ఉండాలని. కానీ కొన్నిసార్లు దారుణమైన అన్యాయం కళ్ళముందు జరిగినప్పుడు, ఆ సూత్రం ఒక నైతిక ద్రోహంలా అనిపిస్తుంది. ఈ ప్రశ్న మీలోని రెండు ఆత్మల గురించి: పాత్రికేయుడు మరియు మానవుడు.

    ఒక కథను కవర్ చేస్తున్నప్పుడు, అందులోని అన్యాయం ఎంత దారుణంగా ఉందంటే, ఒక పాత్రికేయుడిగా మీరు పాటించాల్సిన నిర్లిప్తత నియమం మీకు సరిపోదనిపించిన సందర్భం ఎప్పుడైనా ఉందా? ఆ క్షణంలో, మీలోని మానవుడిని మేల్కొలపాలనిపించిందా? అంటే... నోట్‌బుక్ పక్కనపెట్టి, నిరసనలో గొంతు కలపాలని, లేదా మీ వేదికను కేవలం సమాచారం కోసమే కాకుండా, ఒక నిర్దిష్ట ఫలితం కోసం ఉద్యమించడానికే ఉపయోగించాలని అనిపించిందా?

    మీరు మీ గీతను ఎక్కడ గీస్తారు? మీ వృత్తి యొక్క అత్యున్నత లక్ష్యం... మన కాలానికి సంబంధించిన దోషరహితమైన రికార్డును సృష్టించడమా? లేక చరిత్ర గమనాన్ని, కొద్దిగానైనా సరే, న్యాయం వైపుకు వంచడమా?
    *కలం Vs. కవాతు (The Pen Vs. The March)* We are often told the golden rule of journalism is objectivity—to be a dispassionate chronicler of events. But in the face of profound and undeniable injustice, that rule can feel like a moral betrayal. This question is about the two souls living within you: the Journalist and the Human. Have you ever covered a story where the 'objective' truth was so monstrously unjust that the Journalist's code of dispassion felt wholly inadequate? In that moment, did you feel a pull to let the Human take over—to drop the notebook, join the protest, or use your platform not just to inform, but to actively campaign for a specific outcome? Where do you draw your personal line? Is the highest calling of your profession to create a perfect, unimpeachable record of our times, or is it to bend the arc of history, even just a little, towards justice? జర్నలిజం యొక్క స్వర్ణ సూత్రం 'నిష్పాక్షికత' అని మనకు చెబుతారు - సంఘటనలకు కేవలం నిర్లిప్త సాక్షిగా ఉండాలని. కానీ కొన్నిసార్లు దారుణమైన అన్యాయం కళ్ళముందు జరిగినప్పుడు, ఆ సూత్రం ఒక నైతిక ద్రోహంలా అనిపిస్తుంది. ఈ ప్రశ్న మీలోని రెండు ఆత్మల గురించి: పాత్రికేయుడు మరియు మానవుడు. ఒక కథను కవర్ చేస్తున్నప్పుడు, అందులోని అన్యాయం ఎంత దారుణంగా ఉందంటే, ఒక పాత్రికేయుడిగా మీరు పాటించాల్సిన నిర్లిప్తత నియమం మీకు సరిపోదనిపించిన సందర్భం ఎప్పుడైనా ఉందా? ఆ క్షణంలో, మీలోని మానవుడిని మేల్కొలపాలనిపించిందా? అంటే... నోట్‌బుక్ పక్కనపెట్టి, నిరసనలో గొంతు కలపాలని, లేదా మీ వేదికను కేవలం సమాచారం కోసమే కాకుండా, ఒక నిర్దిష్ట ఫలితం కోసం ఉద్యమించడానికే ఉపయోగించాలని అనిపించిందా? మీరు మీ గీతను ఎక్కడ గీస్తారు? మీ వృత్తి యొక్క అత్యున్నత లక్ష్యం... మన కాలానికి సంబంధించిన దోషరహితమైన రికార్డును సృష్టించడమా? లేక చరిత్ర గమనాన్ని, కొద్దిగానైనా సరే, న్యాయం వైపుకు వంచడమా?
    Like
    1
    0 Comments 0 Shares 5K Views 0 Reviews
  • In an environment where the lines between patriotism and journalism are constantly tested, and where institutional and commercial pressures are immense, have you ever faced a moment where you had to choose between the truth that India needs to hear and the story that your audience, your management, or the nation wants to hear?

    In that moment of conflict, who—or what—is your ultimate allegiance to?
    In an environment where the lines between patriotism and journalism are constantly tested, and where institutional and commercial pressures are immense, have you ever faced a moment where you had to choose between the truth that India needs to hear and the story that your audience, your management, or the nation wants to hear? In that moment of conflict, who—or what—is your ultimate allegiance to?
    0 Comments 0 Shares 3K Views 0 Reviews
More Results
Bharat Aawaz | BMA https://ba.bharataawaz.com